|
If you live in Canary Wharf ward you will be getting a letter through the post from me (if you are registered to vote). For cost reasons I only sent one per household for larger households, I hope you can share within your family/household. I know most of you do not read stuff we put through letter boxes but I thought I should do at least one posted letter to ensure maximum receipt about what I have done for the last 4 years. I know it is too detailed but I dislike political leaflets which are full of slogans and minimal detail and many of you know I like writing 10 words when 5 would do. Full copy below or you can get a PDF copy here & here
0 Comments
Fire Safety briefing - part of Councils Overview & Scrutiny Committee Fire Safety Review which I attended Stephen Dudeney - TH Fire Brigade (FB) Commander - an expert on tall building fires provided a briefing 2 serious fires in Hertfordshire in 2005 and Southampton 2010 each resulted in 2 firefighter deaths. This resulted in major changes to how they respond to big fires + Grenfell Fire in a high rise building = FB send 5 fire engines and 1 fire ladder Multiple 999 calls in a high rise building i.e. Grenfell = FB send 8 vehicles plus senior commander (who can call in more resources) Fire in high rise with known cladding issues = FB send 10 vehicles plus senior commander Aerial fire ladder - 15 in London with 30 meter tall ladders - built between 2002 & 2007 but will be replaced becuase of Low Emission Zone issues on air quality. Will buy 10 with 30 meter long ladders and 5 with 55 meter long ladders (went to Germany to look at new ladders). Can in theory buy longer ladders but cannot get them around London streets. Do not think they need 55 meter long ladders but post Grenfell cannot take risks. Are buying camera drones as well but for wider policing and security use as well. They borrowed one from Kent for Grenfell. I asked question are they ready for 75 storey buiding? Yes, critical issue is how quickly they can get from ground to source of fire (they usually start fire fighting ops 2 floors below fire source). They will use lifts to get up quickly if necessary. Tall buildings now built to much better safety standards and should have wet risers, air tight stair wells, fire risers etc FB try and visit major buildings regularly and a major tall building would get annual visits so that crews are familiar with layout. Layout of buildings are uploaded onto mobile data terminals which FB can access on the way But each major building should have a "Premises information" plate with basic safety information FB need (you may want to check your building) His advice is still very much to stay in place if there is a major fire elsewhere in building. If you exit building it makes it more difficult for FB to get in and move around as stairwells blocked. Only two places where advice did not work was Lakanal House and Grenfell. But there are thousands of fires each year and in 99.99% of cases staying put is the right thing to do but sometimes it is not. Nobody in the UK has died in a fire where the building had operational sprinklers Next meeting in February will go into more detail on these issues. Rest of meeting about TH Council role and Social Landlords will post later Was really surprised only 2 Councillors attended session tonight. I have to admit I missed first meeting where they agreed terms of review as looking after my niece but I had expected a larger turnout from Councillors given the issue  Slightly long read but I hope you will find interesting about some of the problems with politics in Tower Hamlets.
I was elected in May 2014 and part of my job is to hold the administration of Tower Hamlets Council to account since in 2010 voters in TH decided in a referendum to give all power to an Executive Mayor instead of Councillors. But I quickly realised that Council officers had a different view of my job and routinely did not tell me what was happening in my ward, one reason why I always read notices on lampposts and talk to developers to try and find out what is going on. The perfect example was the South Quay Masterplan consultation process in autumn 2014. On the Saturday I read a small advert in the back of East End Life saying that there would be a public consultation on a new plan for South Quay (I read it in a library as my building like many others did not receive the paper). I had missed the 1st event on Thursday (1 person had turned up after seeing a sign outside). You could only find the notice on the Council website by searching for the words ‘South Quay Masterplan’ and that notice was only posted 90 minutes before the 1st meeting. Nobody told me about what was going on. I told people about the 2nd event and over 20 people turned up. It was the one of the main drivers for setting up the Isle of Dogs Neighbourhood Planning Forum and for my spending so much time on social media. The Council are still very poor on communication and in involving residents. After Lutfur Rahman was removed things have improved. John Biggs has been a very hard working and diligent Mayor and while I might disagree with him on priorities and some decisions I have always respected his abilities. I probably do not spend enough time highlighting the improvements but the Council has 21 Comm’s staff and the whole of the Labour party (as a reminder the GLA assembly member, 2 MP’s, the Mayor and 23 Councillors in TH are Labour) to trumpet their achievements. They should not need my help as well. But I believe strongly that progress must be quicker and there are still huge issues within the Council. We are the fastest growing Borough in the country and need to be much better at some things like construction management and infrastructure delivery. Many of my Labour colleagues agree as they also talk about resistance to change within the Council and that the culture needs to change. Ironically one of the biggest issues we face next May is that too many good Labour Councillors are standing down depriving the ruling party of experienced Cllrs (& Labour is the ruling party in TH) Unfortunately, things have become complicated recently and not as much progress has been made as I would like and we have gone backwards this year. In particular, there have been serious issues with; • Children’s Services badly failing OFSTED • Repeated attempts to build on the gardens at Salmon Lane • Rushing through £119 million to spend on affordable homes (see below) • Tower Hamlets schools not improving as quickly as other London schools so our schools are now average for London rather than being the best as is often claimed • Alpha Square bribery (see below) This creates serious issues for me. My involvement with the Neighbourhood Planning Forum means that I need to be strictly non-party political in that role and it does include Labour party members, Greens, Liberal Democrats, Marxists etc. who all make important contributions. But I was also elected to hold the administration to account and for the first time there is a conflict between my two roles. I would have preferred for that conflict not to exist as I need to have good relations with the Mayor if I want stuff done for my residents. But I cannot ignore the issues listed above either. The Council should have called the Police to investigate the bribery allegations as soon as they heard rather than wait to be told, it is not their job to decide whether something is criminal or not. For the same reason, they should have clearly informed the Commissioners (one of whom was a former police officers), they are now saying they told them broadly but the Commissioners are saying they did not know. I think politics in Tower Hamlets (UK as well) is too tribal and that one reason why TH has not improved as much as it should is due to the dis-functional nature of politics in TH. The £119 million affordable homes decision was issued at 7.31pm on a Friday night as an Executive decision. It did not go through the normal Cabinet process despite being the biggest single decision made in recent years. Then in the following Council meeting Labour keep bringing forward non-urgent motions so that we have less then 2 minutes at 10.15pm to discuss it before voting on it. My group call it in and it gets debated at 9.30pm the following day (I did agree it should go later on the agenda). But we only had thirty minutes to discuss and the Cabinet members spoke for so long that we miss the opportunity to ask the three senior Council officers present any detailed questions. The issue is that we should be spending more than £119 million on affordable homes, that none of this is creating any brand-new homes only buying old homes or homes already with planning permission. Tower Hamlets Council urgently need to find some big schemes to invest in rather than trying to build on small green sites if we are to build the new affordable homes we need (I have said the same to central government). But rather then celebrating this important investment it is rushed through with no debate and almost no scrutiny. Now the Alpha Square bribery case is embarrassing for me as well. I have spoken against many planning applications and on the Council website there are many examples of this. But I am not a NIMBY, I am not against all development and sometimes I feel I need to prove that, as it would be easy as a politician to simply say I hate it all. I have spoken in favour of two applications. One was to complete the half-built building by the Hilton hotel. The other was that I spoke in favour of the new primary school, community space, GP offices and the preservation of the North Pole pub at Alpha Square at the Council and GLA. I was not happy with the height and density. But so many planning applications had been approved nearby with no infrastructure attached i.e. Wardian, South Quay Plaza, 2 Millharbour, The Spire, Landmark Pinnacle etc. etc. that I was worried that I would only end up with the one primary school at 3 Millharbour, no extra GP space and would lose one of the few historic buildings left. You can read exactly what I said on page 18 of this link https://www.london.gov.uk/…/gla_-_alpha_square_rep_hearing_… Fortunately, I now know that in this case the developer did not pay any bribes but I am sure people will say that the final decision was still corrupt. But does this mean that no Councillor can now speak in favour of a planning application in case we are considered corrupt? This is what is so damaging about the Alpha Square bribery is that we cannot be sure anymore that bribery is not there especially as the Police have failed to investigate. But I met somebody once at a coffee shop in Canary Wharf to talk about local issues, he used to be involved in Tower Hamlets politics and he bought me a hot chocolate, cost about £3.50. But later he was involved in the Alpha Square development. Since then when I meet people I either do not drink, pay for drinks myself or where I cannot avoid it i.e. Canary Wharf Group events make a donation to Mudchute Farm for the value of food and drink received. But to find out what is going on I still need to speak to people and that is best done at coffee shops. Separately another person running against me next May has started calling me Islamophobic although she has deleted her most recent Tweet. It is typical of TH politics that you use lies to smear your opponents. But in 2010 Phil Woolas, a former Labour minister lost his seat after a court agreed that he had lied in an election. There are rules about lying in the Representation of the People Act 1983. She said I was Islamophobic because I said that a publicly owned building built on public land should not have separate male and female entrances. This is because I believe that government and religion should be separate. I did tell her that separate entrances in a mosque were acceptable if privately built but that increasingly in Europe there are Muslim prayer groups where men and women pray together which I think is the right solution. There is a lot of online material proving that I am not Islamophobic and I have many Muslim friends willing to testify in Court that I am not Islamophobic in case she wants to lie again. As an example, I am on record at the GLA asking to ensure that new community space is also appropriate for Muslim prayer as well as other community wide uses. I am an atheist who believes in freedom of religion. Top of page 8 https://www.london.gov.uk/…/gla_-_former_westferry_printwor… But with elections approaching on the 3rd May 2018 we will see more of this. I will be standing to be elected again as the Councillor for Canary Wharf ward in May. If people think I have done a good job I hope they will vote for me but if I am not elected I can go on a proper holiday for the first time in 4 years :) Following the Sunday Times exposure of corruption in the planning process, Tower Hamlets Conservatives call for Commissioners to be re-instated and oversee planning applications and for a full and proper police investigation into this scandal. The Sunday Times exposure that a “fixer” with close connections to the local and national Labour Party requires immediate answers. There is more large scale development in Tower Hamlets than anywhere else in the country and this development dominates the Isle of Dogs. In the last seven years Tower Hamlets Council has approved residential towers of 75, 68, 67, 60, 55 storeys in height plus many more between 40 & 50 storeys high, most within walking distance of Alpha Square. There has long been a belief locally that the system has been corrupted by fixers and middle men with connections to councillors. Now we have overwhelming evidence that the system may have been deeply corrupted through influence peddling and even the bribery of Councillors. We therefore find it astonishing that this was all kept secret and that Labour’s Mayor John Biggs did not report this issue immediately to the police on the 26th November 2015, five months after his election, when he was told about it and demand that the police fully investigate. Nothing appears to have been done until at least five months later when external consultants Ernst and Young were brought in sometime during April 2016, who then recommended calling in the police. During this entire period Councillor Shiria Khatun, named in the Sunday Times, was Cabinet member for Community Safety which involved her dealing with the police on a regular basis. The Councils own anti-bribery policy says: ‘Rigorously investigating instances of alleged bribery and assisting police and other appropriate authorities in any resultant prosecution’1 and its anti-fraud and corruption strategy says ‘We expect our Directors and Heads of Service to deal firmly and quickly with anyone who is responsible for fraud or corruption. Head of Paid Service/Director of Resources in consultation with the Corporate Anti- Fraud Manager may refer matters to the police if there is suspicion of any criminal activity having taken place.’2 Calling in Ernst and Young after five months as opposed to the fraud squad does not satisfy the Councils own policy requirements. Were other developers approached by this individual after meetings set up by the former Deputy Mayor for Tower Hamlets? Was the Mayor concerned about donations made directly to the Labour Party? Councillor Andrew Wood, deputy leader of the Conservative Group said: “Whilst this story maybe one of a businessman close to the Labour Party trying his luck the delay in reporting this to the appropriate authorities and the resultant secrecy we believe is extremely damaging at a time when the Council was trying to emerge from the cloud left by Lutfur Rahman. It suggests nothing much has actually changed.” Councillor Peter Golds, Conservative Group leader is calling on the Secretary of State to;
The Conservative Group are also calling for full disclosure by Tower Hamlets Council on:
Finally in the public interest, we call upon;
1. New Homes Bonus for building the most new homes in the country Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-homes-bonus-final-allocations-2017-to-2018 2. Council Bribery Policy https://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Risk-management-and-insurance/Anti-Fraud/anti-bribery-policy.pdf 3. Council Anti-Fraud & Corruption Strategy https://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Finance/Financial-transactions-management/Fraud/Anti-Fraud-Strategy.pdf 
Link here to the full detail on the planning website
development.towerhamlets.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=DCAPR_122658 Dear resident, As many of you are aware the demolition of Westferry Printworks has caused considerable problems in the surrounding area. I raised these issues with Tower Hamlets Council back in April and was disappointed by their response. But it proves locally that we have to pay attention to what are called the Construction Management Plans where the developer agrees with the Council how construction will proceed. Like you I have learnt a lot of lessons about demolition and the creation of large concrete waste piles. Mace have submitted to Tower Hamlets Council a construction management plan for the next phase of construction which is due to start in October. It only covers the next phase of construction not the whole programme. It mainly covers the preparation of the site, moving utilities and the construction of a common basement. The deadline for agreement is the 19th September. You should have also seen an invite from Mace for a meeting on Tuesday 12th September at Stafford Street Friendship Club, 40 Stafford Street, E14 8LT at 6.30pm (you need to RSVP to westferrye14@themorrisconsultancy.co.uk by Monday) As a reminder, this is what is being built; • Ten residential buildings, tallest up to 30 storeys, retail, restaurant and office space; a community centre, a health centre, basement car parking and a crèche. • Facilitation of a plot to enable the construction of a 1,200 pupil secondary school which will be constructed by somebody else. Tower Hamlets Council have not yet committed to building the school so it maybe built at a separate time. • A new energy centre will be built to serve the development I provide a link to the Construction Management Plan above. You can tell the Council what you think by emailing them at planning@towerhamlets.gov.uk please cc me in at cllrandrewwood@gmail.com quoting PA/17/01954 Westferry Printworks Some of the key points are;
This is only a summary so I recommend reading the full document. Please also email the Council, it will help me to apply pressure on them to do a better job of supervising what happens. They have a habit of just approving whatever the developer submits. I wrote this article about the recent story about a five year old girl fostered by Tower Hamlets Council
www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2017/09/andrew-wood-tower-hamlets-council-must-put-the-interests-of-children-ahead-of-political-correctness.html |
|||||
RSS Feed